ShareThis Page
Lady Greyhounds set to turn up the tempo against Gissendanner, Clairton |

Lady Greyhounds set to turn up the tempo against Gissendanner, Clairton

Jeff Oliver
| Friday, March 2, 2001 12:00 a.m

The top-seeded Lady Greyhounds (21-5) meet second-seeded Clairton (17-9) in the WPIAL title game at Duquesne’s A.J. Palumbo Center tonight (tip-off 5 p.m.).

The game will feature a showdown of two of the state’s premier young players in Clairton’s Kamela Gissendanner, a 6-1 sophomore (24.3 ppg) and Monessen’s Charel Allen, a 5-10 freshman (22.8 ppg).

While Corley knows his team will have to figure out a way to handle Gissendanner, he says that the Lady Bears better be concerned with his team, too.

‘It’s not going to be a game of shutting (Gissendanner) down,’ Corley said. ‘It’s going to be whether they can shut us down. I just don’t think they are as quick as we are, but we’ll see. The team that is in better shape will win and we’re definitely going to try and run them.’

Gissendanner, who is among the top scorers in all the WPIAL, is no stranger to the Lady Greyhounds. Monessen played against Clairton twice last season and has scouted the team this season.

‘Gissendanner is probably 80 percent of their offense,’ said Corley. ‘If you shut her down, then you can win. We’re not going to do anything different than we have been doing. We’ll see if she can run for four quarters.’

Corley thinks that a one-player team will have a tough time beating Monessen.

‘Everybody talks about Gissendanner, but I think that Charel is just as good,’ Corley said. ‘It’s just that Charel has more players around her. Don’t forget we have Nychole Whitlock, who can score 20 points. And Erica Yuschak didn’t score against Rochester, but she can explode for 15 points in the next game.’

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.