Lamb says he will seek 3rd term as Pittsburgh’s controller |

Lamb says he will seek 3rd term as Pittsburgh’s controller

Philip G. Pavely | Tribune-Review
City Controller Michael Lamb in March 2013

Pittsburgh City Controller Michael Lamb said Wednesday he plans to run for another term so he can “continue to be an independent voice fighting to stop the waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars.”

Lamb, 52, of Mt. Washington announced he would seek a third four-year term during a meeting with members of the Pittsburgh Regional Building Trades Council, which represents dozens of labor unions in Western Pennsylvania.

“Over the past several years we have made many strides in getting the city financial house in order,” Lamb said in a statement. “Despite those successes, we still see increased spending, and waste of taxpayer dollars. I am running for re-election because I will continue to be an independent voice fighting to stop the waste and abuse of taxpayer dollars, and fighting for a more transparent city government.”

Lamb became controller in 2008. His salary is $70,343 a year, according to the 2015 city budget, which says the Controller’s Office has an operating budget of $3.2 million.

No other candidates have announced plans to run.

Lamb, a Democrat, ran unsuccessful mayoral primary campaigns in 2013 and 2005. Previously, he headed the Allegheny County prothonotary’s office, a civil court record-keeping agency that voters eliminated in 2005 through a referendum that supported consolidating the county’s row offices.

He has a law degree from Duquesne University, a master’s degree from the Heinz College at Carnegie Mellon University and a bachelor’s degree from Penn State University.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.