Latrobe takes a bruising on the road |

Latrobe takes a bruising on the road

Greater Latrobe went a long way to take a big loss last Friday. At least it was only an exhibition game.

The Wildcats had their heads handed to them at Canon-McMillan, 40-3, their first loss of the season. Latrobe is back home and back in section play tonight when they host Kiski Area, which thumped Indiana last Saturday.

Placekicker Joel Palko had the only score for Latrobe, a first quarter 26 yard field goal that gave the Wildcats a short-lived 3-0 lead.

After that is was all a Big Mac attack, as they were much more physical than their visitors. Last year the Wildcats also lost to the Washington County school, 26-10.

Latrobe seemed to be moving the ball well in that opening drive, netting three quick first downs before the drive stalled.

But the Wildcats finished the game with only 216 yards, and the winners almost doubled that total, at 415.

The Big Macs, who are coached by first-year Coach Guy Montecalvo, who won 192 games in 23 seasons at Washington High School, racked up 346 yards on the ground.

Brendon Steele proved worthy of the family name, rushing for 125 yards and three touchdowns.

Quarterback Doug Rheam threw a 17 yard scoring pass to Eric Taylor, Kendall Davis scored on an eight yard run and, adding a little insult to injury, the final CM touchdown came on a 44 yard reverse.

Latrobe’s top rusher, Chris Sarnese, was held to just 32 yards.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.