Laurel Mountain ski resort plans approved |

Laurel Mountain ski resort plans approved

Renovations of the ski facilities at Laurel Mountain State Park can move forward.

At the Ligonier Township supervisors meeting on Monday, the board unanimously voted to approve the state’s final plan to restore the resort. The approval is contingent on the state’s application for a grading permit from the township zoning department.

“I’m excited because I’m a skier,” chairman Paul Knupp said. “It will promote Ligonier Valley and bring tourism into the area, so I’m in favor 100 percent.”

Last year, Knupp cited getting the resort reopened as one of his goals for 2014.

A representative for the park or the project was not present at the meeting.

The current plan, which architect Cherie H. Moshier of Moshier Studio in Pittsburgh and engineer Keith Gindlesperger of H.F. Lenz Co. in Johnstown described to the planning commission last month, includes replacing a ski lift, improving snowmaking capabilities and upgrading the electrical facilities. A previously included snowtubing park and parking lot are no longer part of the project. Gindlesperger said at that meeting that the state hopes to get the project out to bid in January to have the slopes reopened for fall 2015.

Township manager Terry Carcella explained the updates to the plan should be considered revisions since the supervisors had originally approved the project in 2011.

Supervisors Tim Komar and Scott Matson said they believe reopening the resort will be good for the community.

“From where I live I can see the lights on the slopes when they’re lit up,” Komar said. “I think it will be great for the community. Anything that we can bring people in to do and helps support the community is a plus.”

The 84-acre resort, located within the 500-plus-acre park, has been closed since 2005.

In other business, the supervisors approved a request from Coal Loaders Inc. to reclaim the land by a collapsed mine shaft near Tosh Road on a private property. The company, which is currently working on a land reclamation project at the site, asked permission to extend its permit line to fix the issue.

“It is a hazard,” Carcella said. “It does need to be cleaned up.”

The local recycling program, operated voluntarily by the Loyalhanna Watershed Association, is in danger of closing due to a lack of funding. Carcella said he recently met with the association and the state Department of Environmental Protection to discuss options for the program.

“Recycling is in bad shape in most parts of the state as far the dollars and places to take it,” he said. “It’s getting very expensive.”

Carcella is looking into obtaining a grant for a study and seeing if the township can partner with other recycling programs in the region.

“We need to expand this and look into this a little bit deeper,” he said. “I want to make you aware that this is a critical state right now for recycling in the township. I don’t want to wait until the last minute when the program ends and there are no funds. I want to let you know way ahead of time we need to address this and look into it.”

The board approved expanding a contract with the EADS Group to include more time for review of the zoning ordinance, which is being revised, and assistance in other areas of planning. Additionally, the board approved a contract with the Cohen Municipal Planning Consultants for help in the zoning office on an as-needed basis.

The next meeting will be held 7 p.m. Dec. 9.

Nicole Chynoweth is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2862 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.