Laurels & Lances |

Laurels & Lances

Flip a switch: It’s Light Up Night in Pittsburgh, the traditional kickoff to the Christmas shopping season. It’s the 50th anniversary of the event. And this year, it’s a two-day affair. The city will be decked out in its holiday finest. Christmas music will be playing all over. Lots of things new and exciting will be on display in Macy’s windows and at retailers everywhere. Market Square will be the hip and magical place to be this year, thanks to the Colcom Foundation. It’s been a tough year for some. But it’s still a magical time of the year. So, in your revelry, share the magic and don’t forget your favorite charity.

On the “Watch List”:

• The Celebration of Lights. The annual Hartwood Acres display bows tonight. But it lacks a corporate sponsor, meaning taxpayers are on the hook for the $1 million cost. The lagging economic recovery is blamed and county officials will have to determine if the event will return next year. We hope a sponsor can be found. For not only is the light show fantastic, donations by those who go to see it represent millions of dollars for charities.

• The Castle Shannon Transit Village. This once-upon-a-time proposal for transit-oriented development along the South Hills trolley line appears to be on the front burner again. But there also appears to be the carrot of a large bolus of taxpayer money attached to it. There’s been no development to speak of along this line in 25 years. Might there be a reason for that — that the market won’t support it• If the private sector won’t develop something like this on its own, why should the public be turned into venture capitalists?

Lance: To Luke Ravenstahl. For the second time this budget season, Pittsburgh’s mayor submitted to a state oversight board a 2011 budget that’s “balanced” on phantom revenues. He has until Nov. 30 to see if his third time will be the charm. And yet his administration still holds to the fantasy that it can somehow balance the budget without job or service cuts and further right-sizing city government• That’s daft.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.