Law applies to drillers, too |

Law applies to drillers, too

As a resident of Willowbrook Road in Allegheny Township, I was appalled to find that my township is allowing Marcellus drilling anywhere, anytime and in all zones of our township, including residential and agricultural areas.

How shocked I was to find out one such well was being prepared next door to my neighbors and me! When my neighbors and I confronted our township supervisors, we were treated with total disregard and disrespect.

We have been forced to hire an attorney and forced to file an appeal before Allegheny Township’s Zoning Hearing Board. All work on the well pad was to stop automatically when the appeal was filed, according to our lawyer.

But in spite of the appeal, CNX continues to build its well pad.

Where is the township in this entire charade? Is not the township, through its zoning officer, supposed to enforce the zoning law and the appeal placed before it? Obviously, neither the township nor CNX cares to abide by the law. When asked why they are sitting on their hands, township officials refuse to give a credible answer.

How long will the public put up with township officials who refuse to protect the public by refusing to enforce the law? Perhaps when the public hearing takes place next week, the township’s reason for its negligence will be revealed. But don’t count on it.

Dee Frederick

Allegheny Township

Editor’s note: Allegheny Township officials contend that an appeal does not require a work stoppage at this site.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.