ShareThis Page
Lawmaker’s bill calls for pay-raise repeal |

Lawmaker’s bill calls for pay-raise repeal

Brad Bumsted
| Wednesday, August 24, 2005 12:00 a.m

HARRISBURG — A state representative from Lancaster County is seeking cosponsors for his bill to repeal the legislative pay raise.

Republican Rep. Tom Creighton’s bill — HB 1945 — would cut lawmakers’ base salary to $69,647, the salary in place before the July 7 pay hike legislators approved for themselves.

“We’re back to ground zero,” Creighton said Tuesday.

The proposed bill is a response to widespread voter outrage.

The measure, which is still being finalized, would negate the legislation that hiked lawmakers’ salaries by 16 to 34 percent and also boosted salaries for top state officials and judges. At least two area lawmakers — Rep. Mike Turzai, R-McCandless, and Rep. Daryl Metcalfe, R-Cranberry — are cosponsoring the repeal bill.

Asked if Creighton’s bill will be dead on arrival, Stephen Miskin, spokesman for House Majority Leader Sam Smith, R-Punxsutawney, said, “Nothing is DOA, but our main focus will be to continue what we’ve been working on since the beginning of the year: creating a better jobs climate and reducing the tax burden on our taxpayers.”

With the pay raise, most lawmakers are paid $85,103 or $89,155 annually, depending on their rank. Some rank-and-file members without committee chairmanships or subcommittee chairmanships get $81,050.

About half of the General Assembly is taking the money now rather than waiting until after the next election. Creighton’s bill would repeal language enabling lawmakers to take the money now via so-called unvouchered expenses.

It’s unclear whether money already collected as by some legislators would have to be returned to taxpayers if the raise is repealed, Creighton said. “I’d suspect they wouldn’t have to,” he said.

Creighton voted for the pay hike and later asked his constituents to forgive him.

Turzai, who voted against the pay hike, said, “We should repeal the pay raise and focus instead on making Pennsylvania more competitive” to keep and attract business.

Asked if the bill has a chance, Metcalfe, who also voted against the pay raise, said, “There’s no chance if no one introduces anything.”

The full list of cosponsors wasn’t available. Creighton issued a letter seeking support from his colleagues Monday. It goes to the printer Friday.

Creighton’s bill would continue automatic cost-of living increases for legislators, which were put in place in 1995.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.