ShareThis Page
Lawmakers move to require schools to teach cursive amid Common Core wrangling |

Lawmakers move to require schools to teach cursive amid Common Core wrangling

The Associated Press
| Thursday, March 5, 2015 9:45 p.m

CONCORD, N.H. — As schools adopt new education standards and rely more on computers in the classroom, a group of New Hampshire state senators want to make sure the basics of learning cursive and multiplication tables don’t get left behind.

“You definitely need to teach typing and keyboarding, and all of that, but kids do need to be able to sign their names; they do need to be able to read the Founding Fathers’ documents,” said Republican Sen. Nancy Stiles, the main sponsor of a bill that would require public schools to keep teaching both. “(Cursive) is an art and a skill that shouldn’t be lost.”

The push to keep cursive in the classroom has become a nationwide movement as schools adopt the Common Core education standards, which omit mention of the handwriting style. The K-12 standards, adopted by most states, have drawn widespread criticism. Among other objections, opponents say, the standards complicate math education and take away local and state control over school instruction.

New Hampshire senators Thursday passed the bill on a voice vote and sent it to a finance committee to assess possible costs. North Carolina has passed legislation on cursive and multiplication, and several other states have taken up bills to require cursive.

Stiles said she submitted the bill at the request of two constituents. Foes of Common Core say the legislation only begins to scratch the surface of problems with the standards.

But opponents of the measure say it’s unnecessary and misguided because curriculum decisions in New Hampshire have always been made at the local level. State Board of Education Chairman Tom Raffio said the state has no plans to move schools away from teaching cursive or multiplication tables.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.