ShareThis Page
Lawyer in Kia case escapes sanction |

Lawyer in Kia case escapes sanction

| Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:00 p.m

A federal judge declined Wednesday to sanction a lawyer who Kia Motors claims tampered with a court exhibit during a product liability case.

Kendall Few of Greer, S.C., was one of the lawyers who represented a North Versailles man who claimed a defective seat-belt system on a 2000 Sportage contributed to injuries he suffered in a car crash.

U.S. District Judge Terrence McVerry ended the trial Jan. 19 with a ruling that Brown’s lawyers failed to make a case.

Kia filed a motion for $24,000 in sanctions, claiming Few altered an exhibit while inspecting it on Jan. 14. McVerry ruled it was a “very close call,” but there wasn’t enough evidence to show Few deliberately altered the exhibit, and it was likely the trial would have carried over into the next week anyway, so defense witnesses would have had to stay in hotels over the weekend.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.