Archive

ShareThis Page
Lawyers agree to dismiss Penn Hills High School student lawsuit | TribLIVE.com
News

Lawyers agree to dismiss Penn Hills High School student lawsuit

Tribune-Review
| Wednesday, November 26, 2014 10:18 a.m

The parents of a Penn Hills High School student have apparently settled their lawsuit claiming the district failed to terminate a teacher who they said physically assaulted their son.

The parents and the child are only identified in the lawsuit by initials. U.S. District Judge Maurice Cohill on Wednesday approved a motion from both sides to dismiss the case “without prejudice,” which leaves open the possibility of the parents refilling the lawsuit.

The motion doesn’t provide any details of the agreement. Jeffrey Ruder, the lawyer for the parents, and Craig Alexander, the school district’s solicitor, couldn’t be reached for comment.

The lawsuit claimed a high school math teacher in October 2012 slammed a door on the child’s hand and kept his hand pinned against the door frame until a security guard freed the student.

Instead of firing the teacher, the high school had the student sit in the library during math class until it arranged for him to take a different math class, the lawsuit said.

The district said in court documents that it provided the student with math instruction during its investigation and that the teacher was terminated in December 2012.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.