ShareThis Page
LCB posts record sales of more than $2.2 billion |

LCB posts record sales of more than $2.2 billion

Revenue from state wine and spirits sales topped $2.2 billion last year, a record for the Liquor Control Board, agency officials said Wednesday.

But the announcement was made just weeks after a memo from the LCB’s chief of financial operations warned board members that this year might not be so profitable.

Sales and taxes generated $2.24 billion for the fiscal year that ended June 30, about $67 million more than the previous year, or a 3.2 percent increase, according to the LCB. The agency controls all wholesale and retail sales of alcohol in the state and operates more than 600 wine and spirits stores.

Overall, the agency sent more than $526 million in revenue and taxes to the state’s General Fund, $25 million to state police for liquor law enforcement and $2.5 million to the Department of Drug and Alcohol Programs.

Board Chairman Joseph “Skip” Brion said the numbers show the LCB is in a strong financial position.

“As we move forward, we continue to analyze our expenses and sales data to make sure that we’re operating the agency in the most efficient, effective and responsible manner possible to benefit the commonwealth and its citizens,” Brion said.

But the financial picture presented on Wednesday differs from one painted for next year in an internal LCB memo obtained by the Tribune-Review last month.

In that memo, August Hehemann, director of financial operations, warned the three-member Liquor Control Board that net income was projected to fall to $96.2 million this year, or $27.5 million less than the LCB reported on Wednesday.

Hehemann proposed raising the LCB’s markup on products from 30 percent to 35 percent to generate an additional $42 million if implemented for a full year. He cited rising costs for employee benefits and necessary technology upgrades that had been put off in previous years.

An official from a Harrisburg-based political think tank was critical of Hehemann’s comments.

“The memo is saying (that) in the future, ‘If we’re going to be financially stable, we’re going to have to charge everyone more,’” said Nate Benefield, vice president for policy analysis for the conservative Commonwealth Foundation in Harrisburg. “That’s the business model they have.”

But Wendell W. Young IV, president of the United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776, which represents state store employees countered, stating that Hehemann’s memo was just one facet of the agency’s ongoing review of business and sales practices.

“For someone in that (LCB) system to be analyzing what we could do and how we could do it shouldn’t be a shocker to anybody,” he said.

“Contrary to what some politicians … want people to believe, the PLCB is a valuable asset that benefits all Pennsylvanians and continues to produce more and record revenue and profit,” Young said.

State store sales last year were in part driven by Chairman’s Selection wines, which saw a 5.6-percent growth, according to LCB figures. The Chairman’s Selection program offers highly rated but limited-quantity wines sold at deep discounts.

Overall sales of wines and spirits each increased 3.7 percent, figures show.

Gov. Tom Corbett and House Majority Leader Mike Turzai, R-Bradford Woods, have pushed to privatize wine and spirits sales. The House approved a privatization bill last year, but the Senate has not acted on it.

Since then, other proposals have surfaced, but lawmakers in the Republican-controlled General Assembly have yet to coalesce around one and get it to Corbett’s desk. It’s unclear if lawmakers will take up the issue when they return to session this month.

Young said his group and the LCB have pushed for changes that would modernize the agency’s operations, such as increasing store hours, allowing direct shipment of products to consumers and allowing flexibility in pricing. Lawmakers would have to approve those changes.

Kari Andren is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. She can be reached at 724-850-2856 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.