ShareThis Page
Leader Times roundup: West Shamokin boys basketball coach earns 1st victory |

Leader Times roundup: West Shamokin boys basketball coach earns 1st victory

Staff Reports
| Tuesday, December 8, 2015 12:09 a.m

A fast start coupled with a strong shooting night from Jarret Kintz helped West Shamokin get Judd McCullough his first victory as the boys varsity basketball coach.

Kintz scored a game-high 20 points and connected on four 3-pointers as West Shamokin beat Springdale, 65-42, on Monday night.

McCullough spent the past three seasons as West Shamokin’s girls coach before moving to the boys team.

Kintz shot 8 for 12 from the field. The Wolves (1-2) outscored the Dynamos, 24-7, in the first quarter and led 31-16 at halftime.

Ryan Bradigan-Barnett scored 14 points for West Shamokin, Drew Orlosky added 11 points and Brandon Stover had nine assists.

Leechburg 62, Sto-Rox 42 — Leechburg outscored Sto-Rox, 37-25, in the second half as the Blue Devils (1-2) rolled past the Vikings (0-1) in a nonsection game.

Blake Steininger scored a team-high 18 points, J.B. Burtick added 16 and Corey Nulph 12 for the Blue Devils.

Girls basketball

Armstrong 57, Allderdice 35 — After a sluggish first half, Armstrong (2-1) had 39 second-half points against Allderdice (0-3) in a nonconference matchup.

Kenzie Lasher scored a game-high 19 points, Taylar Wolfe had 12 points and Elise Hulings 11 for Armstrong.

Indiana 46, Freeport 29 — Zoe Soilis scored 14 points, and Jenna Manke added 13, but Freeport (1-2) dropped a nonsection game to Class AAA Indiana (3-0). The Yellowjackets trailed by seven entering the fourth quarter but were outscored 15-5 in the final eight minutes.

Highlands 39, Apollo-Ridge 31 — Megan Bonelli scored a team-high 15 points, and Mariah Laird added 10 but Apollo-Ridge (1-3) dropped a nonsection game to Highlands (3-0).

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.