ShareThis Page
Leases still up in air at Fayette airport |

Leases still up in air at Fayette airport

The Fayette County Airport Authority board continued to mull over leases for businesses renting out of the Joseph A. Hardy Connellsville Airport in Dunbar Township.

Solicitor Mark Rowan presented two leases to be approved by the board during Wednesday’s meeting. Two leases were for Aviation Network LLC and the Washington Security Group.

Mark Shipley with Aviation Network LLC, which has operated its business on the site without a lease for a year, said it’s tough for his company to operate at the airport without a lease.

The proposed three-year lease was for the community hangar for a cost of $6,000 per year — $500 per month — and an agreement to purchase 1,000 gallons of fuel at the facility.

Board member Fred Davis took opposition to the lease, saying that board members should have more time to look over the details.

The board changed the lease by basing it on the company having three different aircraft there for the same amount of rent per month and an extra $5 per day for more than three aircraft in the hangar.

The motion for the lease passed, with Davis casting the opposing vote and board member Todd Radolec abstaining.

Davis also had the only dissenting vote to the five-year lease for Washington Security Group for $22,000 per year with an option to have a baseline video document of any pre-existing conditions to the runway. The security group would be responsible for any damage to the runway.

“There’s no amount of time to consider the ramifications to the airport,” Davis said.

In other business, the authority:

— Received a two-page presentation of its 2009 audit by Leo Rudnik, who said it was a good and clean audit.

— Voted to appoint the law firm of Watson, Mundorff, Brooks & Sepic as the board’s solicitor, replacing Rowan, who announced earlier this year that he was resigning as solicitor. Davis cast the only dissenting vote.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.