ShareThis Page
Leechburg residents warned to be vigilant |

Leechburg residents warned to be vigilant

Jaime Shaffer
| Friday, October 15, 2004 12:00 a.m

WEST LEECHBURG — Mayor James Galucci reminds citizens to be vigilant after a rash of burglaries and home invasions in West Leechburg, Leechburg and Gilpin.

State police have been notified and are involved in the ongoing investigation, Galucci said Wednesday night’s council meeting. He also said he is in contact with Crime Watch. The borough is confident the suspects will be apprehended, officials said.

Galucci listed a few things residents could do to help protect themselves:

  • Be wary. If you see anyone or anything suspicious, call the police.

  • Be careful.

  • Listen. The suspects are young and may brag to others about the burglaries.

  • Lock car doors and homes.

    In other business:

  • A $5,000 feasibility study is under way to determine the best way to remove the unused and drained West Leechburg Reservoir. The decision won’t be made quickly, said borough Council President Gary Bell. The study will take at least two years. However, there are already suggestions from the residents on what could take the place of the reservoir.

    Rose Bond proposed a skate park or a bike trail because she said older children have no place to play except nearby Third Street. She’d like to see something go in where kids could work off steam and not bother neighbors. The council explained the feasibility study must be finished first.

    Categories: News
  • TribLIVE commenting policy

    You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

    We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

    While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

    We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

    We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

    We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

    We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

    We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.