ShareThis Page
Legal woes ‘not a good thing’ for show |

Legal woes ‘not a good thing’ for show

Anne Dinnocenzio
| Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:00 a.m

NEW YORK — With its star facing a possible prison sentence, the “Martha Stewart Living” TV show will be put on hiatus after this season winds up, the show’s producers announced Tuesday.

Production of the award-winning syndicated show, distributed by King World Productions, will continue for the remainder of the 11th season, through September.

“I am deeply sorry that it has become necessary for the show to go on hiatus until my personal legal situation is resolved,” said Stewart, founder of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. “I hope to resume our close collaboration just as soon as I am able to do so.”

The company also will eliminate 40 jobs in its television division by June 30, leaving 35 positions, spokeswoman Elizabeth Estroff said.

Stewart, who owns 61 percent of the media empire, also stepped down as chief creative officer and resigned from the company’s board. She assumed the title of founding editorial director.

She had resigned as chairman and chief executive last June after being indicted.

Stewart was convicted March 5 of lying about why she sold 3,928 shares of ImClone Systems stock in 2001, just before the stock price plunged.

She is scheduled for sentencing June 17 and is widely expected to get 10 to 16 months in prison.

Martha Stewart Living said it will continue production of “Petkeeping With Marc Morrone” and accelerate its development of special and new programming such as “Everyday Food.”

Shares in the company fell 11 cents to close at $9.18 on the New York Stock Exchange.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.