Legislation would broaden crimes for which public officials forfeit state pensions |

Legislation would broaden crimes for which public officials forfeit state pensions

HARRISBURG — Legislation to prevent public officials convicted of crimes such as conflict of interest from collecting state pensions appears headed for consideration by the House Judiciary Committee, the bill’s sponsor said Friday.

The bill by Rep. Scott Petri, R-Bucks County, would expand the definition of crimes that require automatic pension forfeiture for elected officials and public employees under a law last amended about three decades ago, he said.

Petri, chairman of the House Ethics Committee, has several versions of the bill but said one likely to move forward adds felonies related to one’s office or public position. They would be added to the crimes covered, he said.

“Pennsylvania’s public corruption laws are ineffective and shortsighted,” said Laurel Brandstetter, former senior deputy attorney general. “The loopholes in Pennsylvania’s Pension Forfeiture Act are wider than the Fort Pitt Tunnel.”

Brandstetter reviewed the bills and prefers Petri’s bill that would prohibit collecting a pension upon conviction of “any crime related to his or her public employment.”

Limiting the additions to felonies “would miss a whole lot of misdemeanor thefts committed while in office,” she said.

Two state officials recently pleaded guilty to conflict of interest and kept their pensions.

Former Sen. LeAnna Washington, D-Philadelphia, pleaded guilty in October to conflict of interest. The Attorney General’s Office dropped a theft charge in a plea deal. Washington, 69, collects a $42,879 pension, records show.

She was accused of forcing her state-paid staff to work on her annual campaign fundraiser, held on her birthday.

Former turnpike CEO Joe Brimmeier, 66, of Ross was charged in a bid-rigging and influence-peddling scheme. He pleaded guilty to conflict of interest in November and kept his $43,027 annual pension, according to records.

Crimes that cause automatic revocation of pensions under the current law include theft by deception, theft by extortion, theft of services, forgery, bribery, tampering with records, false swearing and official oppression.

“Without question, the act should be amended to include the offense of conflict of interest, which is conduct prohibited by Pennsylvania’s Ethics Act,” said Brandstetter, chair of the internal investigations and white-collar practice group for the Leech Tishman Fuscaldo & Lampl law firm in Pittsburgh.

Eric Epstein, co-founder of Rock the Capital, a reform group, has tracked public officials’ pensions since 2005, when lawmakers approved and then repealed a pay raise for themselves.

“We need to tie a rope around the wallet of public employees and officials who enter a guilty plea or who are convicted for violating the (Pension Forfeiture) Act,” Epstein said.

Petri said he is unaware of any opposition to his legislation.

Brad Bumsted is Trib Total Media’s state Capitol reporter. He can be reached at 717-787-1405 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.