ShareThis Page
Legislators to take another drag on smoking ban |

Legislators to take another drag on smoking ban

| Tuesday, March 15, 2005 12:00 a.m

Randy Larson said he sees the benefits: cleaner air and a cleaner bar. Joyce Bowen said she thinks smokers should light up where they please, as long as they’re not bothering anyone.

Larson, the owner of the HomeTowne Tavern in Swissvale, Allegheny County, and Bowen, a bartender at Darby’s Pub in Uniontown, are two voices in the debate over whether Pennsylvania should ban smoking in public places. Though pending legislation died for lack of a vote last year, health advocates have continued pushing for change.

Legislators reportedly plan to revisit the issue during this voting session. Some people think that a smoking ban proposal under review in Philadelphia, if passed, could be a step toward a ban statewide.

Last week, Pennsylvania Medical Society President William W. Lander told the House Health and Human Services Committee that his group backs a ban. He said he is concerned not just with people’s health, but also the greater impact on the health care system.

“As smoking causes avoidable health issues, it drives up the cost of health care as utilization increases,” Lander said, according to a transcript of his remarks.

Lander isn’t alone. Don Schumaker, communications director for the Pennsylvania Alliance to Control Tobacco, said his group wants legislators to take smoking ban bills back to the floor. The sooner, the better, he added.

“We’re hoping that we’re looking at reintroduction so it has time to really take off,” he said.

Lander’s testimony came just days after researchers at the California Air Resources Board announced findings that women exposed to secondhand smoke have up to a 90 percent greater risk of breast cancer.

Secondhand smoke also is responsible for up to 73,400 deaths each year in America, the researchers found.

Banning smoking in Pennsylvania’s restaurants and bars would save thousands of lives by cutting down on secondhand smoke intake and giving smokers reason not to light up, advocates say.

Bernard L. Pucka, executive director of the Allegheny County Tavern Association, believes a law banning smoking would hurt business.

“One of the things these people have to realize is that a tavern isn’t a church,” Pucka said. “People go out there to have fun, to relax, to let loose. I guess smoking isn’t a good thing, but there are still an awful lot of people in this country who smoke. It wouldn’t be right to take it away from them.”

For Bowen, a smoker herself, common courtesy would be a welcome compromise to a smoking ban. She said she doesn’t smoke in front of others without asking whether it would bother them.

“You come in to relax,” she said. “I think you should be able to have a cigarette.”

Pucka agrees.

“Most people are courteous. They won’t fire up and annoy other people with a cigarette,” Pucka said.

Upgrading air-filtering systems is another way to keep the air clean for those who don’t smoke, Bowen said.

But at the HomeTowne Tavern, Larson’s two filters aren’t able to suck up the grime continually wiped from the bar area. Cigarette smoke is to blame, he said.

“It’d be a benefit if nobody smoked,” Larson said. “It wouldn’t bother me a bit, but I’m a nonsmoker.”

Recently, smoking bans have been enacted as near as Columbus, Ohio, and as far away as Italy.

State Sen. Stewart Greenleaf, a Montgomery County Republican, proposed a measure last July that would ban smoking in public places including restaurants and bars. Though debate among smokers, tavern owners and legislators quickly followed, the bill died when the session ended last year.

A call to state Rep. George Kenney Jr., chairman of the Health and Human Services Committee, was not immediately returned. Stanley Mitchell, general counsel to the committee, said he doesn’t know of any smoking ban bills introduced this session.

“I’m not aware of any right now, but I’m told there will be one,” he said.

Despite the apparent lack of state legislation, Philadelphia smokers may soon be unable to light up in public. City council members there are scheduled to vote this week on whether to pass a localized measure that would prohibit smoking in bars and restaurants.

A clause in the 1988 Clean Indoor Air Act allows Philadelphia, the state’s only first-class city, to institute its own ban. The same law thwarted an effort by the Allegheny County Board of Health to develop a localized ban two years ago.

Mitchell was one of several people who said yesterday that the vote in Philadelphia may influence any statewide changes proposed in Harrisburg.

While Bowen thinks a ban would be unfair to smokers, Larson said he doesn’t think it would hurt the taverns.

Having lived in California previously, Larson went back for a visit several years ago after the state banned smoking in public places. The bars, he said, were full of customers.

“It didn’t seem to make a whole lot of difference to people,” Larson said. “Apparently, they adjust.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.