Lending slowdown puts federal home loan banks under pressure |

Lending slowdown puts federal home loan banks under pressure

The slow pace of bank lending has become a drag on a less-visible front — the Federal Home Loan Bank system.

The 12 wholesale banks, including one in Pittsburgh, earn income on money they lend to their member banks. So, when those banks make fewer mortgages and other loans to families and businesses, they don’t borrow as much from the home loan banks.

The Pittsburgh home loan bank, located on Grant Street, Downtown, employs about 230 people. The bank provides funding for home mortgages and community development to 314 member banks in Pennsylvania, Delaware and West Virginia. They range in size from PNC Bank, the state’s largest, to Eureka Bank, which has two offices.

A report on the Federal Home Loan Bank system by Moody’s Investors Services said the wholesale banks’ earnings are improving but are still under pressure. Moody’s rates the 12 home loan banks as well above investment grade, but they face challenges from weak loan demand.

“The banks still have strong liquidity. Deposit growth is still pretty strong, but loan growth is down sharper than in past recessions,” Brian Harris, the analyst who wrote the Moody’s report, said Monday.

Total loans to their member banks dropped nearly 21 percent, to $499 billion as of Sept. 30, vs. $631 billion a year ago, according to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which oversees the home loan bank system.

Total loans were at an all-time high of $929 billion, as of Sept. 30. 2008, “which is unheard of,” said Stephen Cross, the agency’s deputy director.

“Since October 2008, there were a plethora of federal programs to rescue the economy, and home loan bank (loans) came down to a more normal level,” said Cross.

“We stepped in before the Fed programs revved up,” said Terry McKay, spokeswoman for the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh. “So we had to artificially ramp up (loans), and now they are on their way back down.”

Loans to member banks by the Pittsburgh bank fell to under $32 billion as of Sept. 30, a 23 percent drop from a year ago. As a result, net interest income on loans dropped 25 percent to $50.6 million.

The bank had net profit of $45 million last quarter, but “it’s hard to say” if that trend will continue, said McKay. In the same quarter a year ago, the Pittsburgh bank had a loss of $40 million.

Also dampening home loan banks’ results are problem mortgage-backed securities on their books. The 12 home loan banks recorded nearly $4 billion in losses from late 2008 until last quarter on mortgage-backed securities that are now valued about $46 billion, said Cross. In the third quarter of 2009, the Pittsburgh bank had losses on mortgage-backed securities of $190 million.

He estimates “the vast majority of write-downs has already occurred.” But the value of those securities could continue to trickle down until late 2011, said Cross. That’s how long it may take before housing prices recover.

“The longer-term question for home loan banks is, can they make a reasonable return and avoid the kind of systemic risk that hit Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,” said Karen Shaw Petrou, managing partner at Federal Financial Analytics Inc., a Washington consulting firm.

One possible way to increase profit would be for home loan banks to merge. The Chicago and Dallas banks were in merger talks in summer 2007 but later dropped their plans. Coincidentally, the Federal Housing Finance Agency last week proposed rules that would guide such mergers.

The Pittsburgh home loan bank has no merger plans, said McKay. Nor does the bank have any plans to downsize the organization any time soon.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.