ShareThis Page
Less for senator is more for others |

Less for senator is more for others

| Sunday, December 26, 2010 12:00 a.m

He just might be the anti-DeWeese.

Jim Brewster appears uninterested in the perks and privileges afforded to state legislators. Unlike many of his peers, the new Democratic senator from McKeesport doesn’t appear to believe the General Assembly is an elected officials’ country club whose dues are paid by taxpayers.

“We’re supposed to be public servants,” he said, a statement almost certain to draw stern private rebukes from some veteran lawmakers. “None of us should be here for the money.”

Try to picture Bill DeWeese uttering those words.

DeWeese is the long-time Greene County state representative, facing corruption charges. He’s accused of using state employees and resources for campaign purposes. He used to have a state-owned plane fly him between his home and Harrisburg.

Contrast DeWeese’s avaricious attitude toward transportation with that of Brewster, 62, the former McKeesport mayor elected last month to fill former Sen. Sean Logan’s unexpired term. Logan resigned in August to take a job with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

No plane rides for Brewster at taxpayer expense. He won’t even use a state fleet vehicle as many other senators do, relying instead on his 2009 Chevy Avalanche to get to and from the Capitol.

DeWeese was one of the masterminds behind the infamous 2005 legislative pay raise. Brewster has vowed not to accept any salary increase and is declining this year’s 1.67 percent annual cost of living increase that legislators began receiving Dec. 1.

“When you have senior citizens not getting a social security cost of living adjustment, there’s no way in my mind to justify a 1.7 percent COLA for us,” Brewster said. “Frankly, I think our COLAs should be eliminated.”

Brewster can survive that $1,300 hit to the wallet; he’ll make about $78,000 in 2011 even without it. But he stands to lose more by refusing the $157 per diem that lawmakers receive for food and lodging while in Harrisburg.

Refusing to claim per diems, an act of sacrilege to DeWeese and most other legislators, could cost Brewster nearly $8,500 if the Senate next year is in session for as many days as it was this year.

“I’ve just never been motivated by money,” he said.

Brewster’s actions seem to bear that out.

While mayor of McKeesport, he took $10,000 a year less than the $70,000 he was entitled to under the city home rule charter. He finally accepted a raise several years ago, but deferred the compensation until he was out of office.

After recently resigning, though, Brewster didn’t cash that check. Instead, he said he began disbursing the roughly $60,000 in deferred money to community organizations in McKeesport.

He hopes to infuse a similar mentality among his Harrisburg colleagues.

“I’m not out to make any enemies,” he said. “But we can’t continue to do business here the way it’s been done in the past.”

Brewster appears to be the kind of guy the Legislature needs, although his ride in Harrisburg probably will have some bumps.

For example, think how awkward a chance meeting with DeWeese will be. What would they discuss?

The two lawmakers don’t appear to have much in common.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.