‘Let’s Get Lost’ |

‘Let’s Get Lost’

One of the greatest jazz musicians of all time, Chet Baker, was — surprise, surprise — a total mess in his personal life. “Let’s Get Lost” (1988), like a rare recording session passed by hand among the cognoscenti, has accrued a legendary reputation over the years.

Partially, that’s because director Bruce Weber had no idea he was shooting Baker’s last days — the heroin-ravaged singer-trumpeter fell out of a window in Amsterdam, trumpet at his side, in 1988.

Weber seemed to have an intuitive ability to capture the essence of this icon of cool — finding the beauty in both the movie star-like young trumpeter and the withered husk he would become. He cuts fitfully between both like there’s no difference.

Baker embodied pre-rock ‘n’ roll rebelliousness in the ’50s as L.A.’s laidback ambassador of West Coast Cool. His trumpet playing had a slow-burn intensity, and his languorous singing style unfurled each song slowly, like smoke from a cigarette.

For jazz aficionados or the merely jazz-curious, this restored 35mm print of “Let’s Get Lost” is a pretty remarkable document, and has artistic merit as a film in its own right. It’s technically a documentary, but it’s shot like a frenetic, impressionistic French New Wave film, in luxurious black and white.

Of course, we also learn about Baker’s preference for speedballs (a heroin-and-cocaine cocktail), his stint in jail in Italy, and how he got his teeth knocked out in a robbery while trying to cop heroin. Several of his ex-wives and fellow musicians discuss the man they fell in love with, and being left to pick up the pieces when he was gone.

&#149 Regent Square Theater Additional Information:

‘Let’s Get Lost’

NR, but R in nature for nudity, language and drug references; Three and a half stars

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.