ShareThis Page
Letter to the editor: Ellsworth’s policies, character stand out |

Letter to the editor: Ellsworth’s policies, character stand out

Letter To The Editor
| Thursday, May 10, 2018 5:30 p.m

Ellsworth is the choice

The 2018 Republican primary for governor has generated more heat than light when it comes to the two men trading negative — often vicious — television ads.

One candidate has stood alone, away from the trash fight, and kept issues at the center of her campaign: Laura Ellsworth.

For decades we have heard the refrain from voters and pundits that politics has become too negative, too fixed on the horse race rather than policy issues. And yet the bulk of the media attention has gone to precisely the kind of campaigning journalists decry.

Laura’s policy ideas, from her no-budget, no-pay proposal to her practical solutions to build jobs, should be at the center of campaign discussions. Her insistence on running a dignified campaign free of the mud throwing by other candidates should serve as a guide to her character as a leader.

Tuesday gives us a chance to act on what so many have been saying for years: that we’re tired of negative, cynical, attack politics. That means that the best chance any Republican voter has for defeating liberal Tom Wolf in November is to cast a vote for Laura Ellsworth.

Jim Roddey


The writer is a former chairman of the Allegheny County Republican Committee, former Allegheny County Executive and former member of the GOP state leadership committee.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.