ShareThis Page
Letters detail thoughts of gunman killed in Florida State University library shootout |

Letters detail thoughts of gunman killed in Florida State University library shootout

TALLAHASSEE — Authorities are investigating mailed packages linked to a gunman who shot three people before he was killed by officers at Florida State University, the FBI said Friday.

Officials said the packages were part of their investigation into why the gunman opened fire in a crowded library.

Thought to have been mailed by suspected shooter Myron May before his rampage, the packages were not considered a threat to the public, Postal Inspection Service officials said.

One was intercepted by the FBI’s Houston office, a spokeswoman said, noting it contained nothing hazardous.

In Palmdale, Calif., authorities on Friday morning removed a package from the porch of Renee Pittman Mitchell, she told Reuters. She is the author of several books and a website on what she calls “mind control technology,” detailing a covert effort to target people with radio frequency technology.

May reached out to her one week ago, she said, believing he was a target.

“He said, ‘I just don’t want to live my life like this,’ ” according to Mitchell.

She said her package contained a letter and a thumb drive.

She did not thoroughly read her note before turning it over to authorities. Another recipient, however, forwarded her a typed letter that was addressed to her and several others, images of which Mitchell sent to Reuters by email.

The letter, signed by May, explained that he had told no one about his plans and that his goal was to bring media attention “to the plight of targeted individuals.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.