ShareThis Page
Leyland grateful for opportunity with Tigers |

Leyland grateful for opportunity with Tigers

LAKELAND, Fla. – In 2006, Jim Leyland would have jumped at the chance to return to the Pirates. But no one in the front office ever bothered to ask, and Leyland wound up managing the Detroit Tigers.

Two seasons and two Pirates managers later, Leyland believes both sides made the right move.

“There’s no way that I’ll ever separate myself from that organization,” Leyland said Sunday. “It’s home for me, and the people there are so good. And there’s the fact that the Pirates gave me a chance (in 1986). You never forget those things.

“They’re wonderful, wonderful memories. But I think they’re better off and I’m better off also for not managing there (again).”

The Pirates lost 98 games in Leyland’s first season as manager and 89 games when he left a decade later. In between, he helped guide the club to division titles in 1990-92.

The Tigers are Leyland’s third team since leaving Pittsburgh. He won the World Series with the Florida Marlins in 1997, then spent a forgettable season with the Colorado Rockies in 1999.

Three years ago, Leyland spent a lot of time at PNC Park working as a scout for the St. Louis Cardinals. That offseason, the Pirates and Tigers were searching for a manager.

When Leyland’s phone finally rang, it was Detroit general manager Dave Dombrowski making the job offer.

“It turned out to be perfect for me,” said Leyland, who had played and managed for 18 years in the Tigers’ farm system.

“The fact that Dave and I won a World Series together (in Miami), maybe that’s the only reason I got the job,” said Leyland, who turned 63 in December. “I doubt very much that I would’ve gotten any other managing job. With the new wave of young general managers, most of them don’t want a guy like me.”

The Pirates instead hired Jim Tracy. After the team lost 189 games in two seasons, Tracy, along with practically the entire front office, was fired.

The Tigers won 88 games last year and finished second in the American League Central. This past offseason, Dombrowski boosted an already potent roster with two flashy trades that netted Edgar Renteria, Miguel Cabrera and Dontrelle Willis.

Those moves made Detroit a trendy pick to win the World Series.

“Everybody says there’s a lot of pressure,” Leyland said. “But it’s good pressure because we’ve got a good team. I love expectations.

“There were a few years when I managed Pittsburgh when there weren’t many expectations. You don’t want that as a manager. If there aren’t expectations, it normally means you don’t have a chance.”

Leyland said the Pirates made a good choice by hiring John Russell to replace Tracy. But, Leyland added that the most important ingredient for any team is acquiring talented players — it doesn’t matter if they arrive via trades, free agency or the draft.

“John Russell knows as much baseball as I do,” Leyland said. “We all know about the bunt, the hit and run and the intentional walk. We’re not stupid. The fact of the matter is, if the best players execute against the players who aren’t as good, the best players are gonna win.”

Sometimes, that means taking a gamble by trading away a popular player. Leyland pointed to when the Pirates dealt Tony Pena to the Cardinals in 1987 for Andy Van Slyke, Mike LaValliere and Mike Dunne.

“I remember somebody telling me, ‘You can’t trade Pena. He’s our most popular player,’ ” Leyland said. “Look, when you lose 100 games two years in a row and draw 700,000 (fans), you don’t got no popular players.”

Leyland remembers playing against the Pirates last year during spring training, and expecting them to finish around .500.

“I still believe they have some nice pieces,” Leyland said. “If they finish out the puzzle with the right piece and it fits, they’ve got a real chance to be very good — and I don’t think it’s going to be long (in coming). But you’ve got to be willing to do it.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.