ShareThis Page
Ligonier Valley routs Marion Center |

Ligonier Valley routs Marion Center

Robb Patty
| Saturday, October 13, 2007 12:00 a.m

Ligonier Valley felt it something to prove before Friday night’s Heritage Conference game. The Mounties left Weller Field with a 55-14 rout of Marion Center — and a statement to the rest of the conference.

Ligonier Valley scored on its three first-quarter possessions and added a defensive score to take a commanding 28-0 lead going into the second quarter.

The Mounties’ first drive took just six plays. Running back Brandon Boyd finished the drive with a 6-yard touchdown run. Boyd (eight carries, 114 yards) raced 73 yards for a score on Ligonier Valley’s second possession.

“We got back to basics,” Ligonier Valley coach Roger Beitel said. “Our emphasis was on focusing. We got back to the things we started with in camp.”

A 70-yard touchdown run on a reverse by running back Cody McMarlin (seven carries, 130 yards, 2 TDs) gave the Mounties a 21-0 lead. Cornerback Tyler Ulery capped Ligonier Valley’s first-quarter scoring with a 21-yard interception return.

Ligonier Valley had more than 400 yards rushing; the Stingers had 145. The Mounties limited Marion Center quarterback Ryan Lightcap to 2-of-10 passing for 40 yards. He threw two interceptions. Running back Rusty Bopp carried 15 times for 80 yards.

Boyd and McMarlin were not the only Ligonier Valley running backs to eclipse 100 yards. Jon Cotchen had eight carries for 121 yards and a score. Cotchen also caught quarterback Will Fennell’s only touchdown pass of the game, a 17-yarder.

“We were real excited … it was the first time we had three running backs go over 100 yards,” Beitel said.

Beitel alluded to some comments made earlier in the week that he felt were “disrespectful” to his players.

“I don’t understand why people need to say those things, but we had it on our bulletin board,” Beitel said. “Last I checked, we’re 7-0 and have a two-game lead on this conference.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.