ShareThis Page
Local artist says conduct charge is false |

Local artist says conduct charge is false

| Thursday, September 19, 2002 12:00 p.m

A Hill District artist and activist who claims police officers roughed him up during an arrest in July will go to trial on a disorderly conduct charge.

Jorge Myers, 45, of Wylie Avenue, said the officer who arrested him and who testified during his preliminary hearing Wednesday was lying when he said Myers was swearing at police officers when they found him in an abandoned Hill District building.

Pittsburgh magistrate Moira Harrington ruled that there is enough evidence to hold Myers for court on the disorderly conduct charge. Assistant District Attorney Edward Smith had offered Myers to plead guilty to a summary offense, but Myers and his attorney, Ann Simms, refused.

After the hearing, Myers said he wasn’t going to plead guilty to something he didn’t do.

“I can’t believe a police officer would come in to court and lie,” Myers said after the hearing. “I can’t believe I’m here. I need to do my job for my community. I was just trying to protect my community.”

Myers has claimed that officers slammed him repeatedly into a wall while he was handcuffed. Simms said they have filed a civil complaint against the officers. That case has not gone to court.

Officer John Mook of Zone 2 police station testified yesterday that he had received a call from emergency dispatch that there were people inside 2117 Centre Ave., the former Lee’s Flower Shop, now frequented by prostitutes and drug users. Emergency dispatch said it could be a possible burglary in progress, Mook said.

Mook said he entered the building and when he saw Myers, he told him to show him his hands, but Myers only held up one hand and kept one down as he carried a small green bag. Mook said Myers repeatedly refused to drop the bag and also swore at Mook and other officers who responded.

Mook said he didn’t know whether Myers was carrying weapons or drugs in the bag.

Myers is a lifelong resident of the Hill District who boards up crack houses and abandoned buildings. Myers previously said that he was just taking artifacts from the building and had planned to board it up after complaints by nearby residents.

“We are looking forward to the jury trial,” Simms said. “This is a travesty. It is injustice based on untruths.”

Tammy Ewin, city police spokeswoman, said Chief Robert W. McNeilly Jr., believes the court found the officer’s testimony credible enough to support the magistrate’s decision.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.