ShareThis Page
Looking forward to Spadafora-Dorin II |

Looking forward to Spadafora-Dorin II

Mike Prisuta
| Tuesday, May 20, 2003 12:00 a.m

The draw at Petersen Events Center was much more a defining moment for Paul Spadafora than it was a blemish on the previously untainted record of “The Pittsburgh Kid.”

Spadafora may not have won the battle, but he took major strides toward achieving his ultimate objective, which is to become something more than a local sensation.

Although he slipped to 36-0-1 in standing toe-to-toe with Leonard Dorin, Spadafora has never been closer to achieving international respect and acclaim.

We knew “The Pittsburgh Kid” could box.

Now, we know he can also fight.

Dorin can, too, which should make the rematch between the IBF lightweight champion of the world and the WBA lightweight titleholder as anticipated as Spadafora-Dorin I was compelling.

It’s premature to put these two on the same level as legendary adversaries such as Ali-Frazier, Leonard-Duran and Robinson-LaMotta, but the epic staged Saturday night already has boxing enthusiasts drawing comparisons to the Arturo Gatti-Mickey Ward scrapes that have repeatedly proven to be viciously entertaining.

Spadafora-Dorin II can be such a fight, as the first one surely was.

The argument can and has been made that Spadafora would have been better served to continue playing the technician, and that may well be true as far as winning Saturday’s encounter was concerned. But while that may have resulted in a unified title (minus Floyd Mayweather Jr.’s WBC lightweight crown), it might also have put HBO and the boxing community outside of western Pennsylvania to sleep.

Spadafora fought such a fight when he defended his title against Angel Manfredy last year at the Palumbo Center. The “Pittsburgh Kid” was at his technical best that night, which meant that the most entertaining aspect of the evening involved observing the wardrobes and antics of all the wiseguy-wannabes in attendance.

This was decidedly different.

This was as courageous as it was combative.

This put Spadafora on the map.

Long-time boxing analyst Larry Merchant of HBO was so moved by what transpired that he mentioned Spadafora in the same breath as Pittsburgh legends Harry Greb, Billy Conn and Fritzie Zivic.

Spadafora isn’t in their class, Merchant maintained, but he’s in their mold.

No one was saying such things after Manfredy was disposed of in a perfunctory fashion that to that point had been typical of Spadafora.

What might they be saying the next time?

That “The Pittsburgh Kid” has truly arrived• That he’s an undeniable rising star• That a meeting with Mayweather is no longer conceivably possible but absolutely mandatory if the sport and its fans are to be properly served by the promoters and managers and TV executives dividing up all that money?

In that light, Spadafora lost nothing and gained everything, even though he failed to beat Dorin this time.

Spadafora even demonstrated the class of a champion after fighting as one by offering to have the rematch staged in Romania, returning the favor of Dorin fighting in Spadafora’s hometown, and by accepting a decision he disagreed with much more with grace than contempt (as did Dorin).

In a game too often dominated by sleaze and behavior that’s either childish, cretinous or criminal, Spadafora and Dorin provided a breath of fresh air.

More and more, it’s becoming apparent that Spadafora not only knows what he wants from his career but is also well aware of the best way to go about getting it.

Clearly, he’s taken the pursuit of such to a new level, draw and all.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.