Lost hummingbird flies south — in jet |

Lost hummingbird flies south — in jet

The Associated Press

ST. PAUL — A hummingbird has finally made its way south for the winter after accidentally ending up in Minnesota.

The rufous hummingbird was released Sunday in Texas after being flown there on a private jet supplied by an anonymous donor, according to the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Minnesota.

“We are delighted that the rufous hummingbird is free in the wild and able to decide when and where he goes on life’s journey,” said Phil Jenni, executive director of the Roseville wildlife center.

The bird was brought to the center earlier this month when it ended up at the feeder of a St. Paul homeowner. The woman rescued the hummingbird because she realized it wasn’t likely to survive the unseasonably cold weather at the time.

Experts believe the same system that brought the wintry weather blew the rust-colored bird off its migratory course, the Star Tribune reported.

Federal officials said the bird should have been allowed to find its own way to Mexico, where it typically migrates for the winter.

But the bird, which weighed less than a penny, was considered somewhat underweight for migration, Jenni said. And with temperatures dipping close to zero, the wildlife center decided to transport the bird to a wildlife rehabilitator in Texas.

There have been only 16 documented sightings of rufous hummingbirds in Minnesota since the 1970s, according to Jenni.

The bird is most commonly found in the Pacific Northwest.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.