ShareThis Page
Ludlum to pay federal government $535,000 for Superfund site |

Ludlum to pay federal government $535,000 for Superfund site

| Thursday, February 23, 2012 12:00 a.m

Allegheny Ludlum has agreed to reimburse the federal government for $535,000 of past cleanup costs at the Breslube-Penn Superfund site in Moon Township, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said.

The company is the last of 158 responsible parties to reach a settlement with the EPA since 2005 over cleanup costs associated with the site.

In 1978, Wiseman Oil built a facility that made lubricating oil by recycling waste oil. Wiseman Oil went bankrupt in 1982. The property was bought by Breslube-Penn, which continued used-oil reprocessing until 1986. The facility was used as a used-oil transfer station from 1987 until it was closed in 1992.

Allegheny Ludlum was a customer of Wiseman and Breslube-Penn and had sent oil to the facility for recycling, a Ludlum spokesman said. He had no comment on the settlement.

Under the Superfund law, the landowners, waste generators and waste transporters that are responsible for the contamination of a Superfund site must either clean up the site or reimburse the government or other parties for cleanup activities.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.