ShareThis Page
Majestic Star owner ‘not worried’ |

Majestic Star owner ‘not worried’

HARRISBURG — The cost of the planned North Shore casino has risen, and owner Don Barden still does not have enough money in place to finish construction, his spokesman said this morning.

Barden said he’s “not worried” about getting the money when he spoke to members of the state Gaming Control Board at their regular monthly meeting today. He still expects to open the Majestic Star Casino in May 2009.

“It’s moving along at just a terrific pace,” Barden told the board, adding that he could not provide specifics on his attempts to secure financing.

Board members asked few questions. Member Ray Angeli wanted to know whether Barden is concerned that a lack of permanent financing could slow down or halt construction. Barden started construction last year after obtaining a bridge loan that was set to expire in May. Barden has declined to say how he’s managed to keep work going past the deadline.

Barden answered that all of the steel is on the 17-acre site and that 65 percent of it already is in place.

Construction costs have been driven in part by the soaring price of concrete, said spokesman Bob Oltmanns. The cost of the casino has been pegged at $780 million.

“Lenders are extremely cautious in this environment,” Oltmanns said.

He added that Barden had told gambling board staff that he would have few details. Barden told board members he expects to have a financing plan in place before the board’s next meeting on July 10.

Christopher Wink is an intern with the Pennsylvania Legislative Correspondents Association.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.