ShareThis Page
Mall at Robinson to reopen after Sunday bomb threat |

Mall at Robinson to reopen after Sunday bomb threat

Stephanie Strasburg | Tribune-Review
Mall employees and evacuated shoppers wait outside the Mall at Robinson after the mall was evacuated in the early afternoon of Sunday, April 14, 2013. 'We had to clear out the storeā€¦People were yelling and pushing and running because no one knew what was going on,' said JCPenney employee Raquel Redman, 21, of West End. 'All the stores are losing out on tons of money, we were incredibly busy.' Roads were shut down to the mall and its parking lots, creating a slowing of traffic on nearby streets as people coming to shop crawled by in their detoured cars.

The Mall at Robinson is expected to reopen today after police evacuated the building Sunday afternoon for a bomb threat.

Fire, police and emergency medical technicians were sent to the mall after the threat was received shortly before 1:30 p.m., according to an Allegheny County 911 supervisor.

The threat was made via a note placed in the Sears store, the supervisor said.

Bomb technicians and other officers from the Pittsburgh and Allegheny County police departments were dispatched to help search the building, officials said.

Fire equipment was parked in front of the entrances to prevent people from entering the building and employees were kept outside for several hours while the building was checked.

Customers and others who left items behind in the rush to clear the mall must return Monday after it reopens to reclaim their property.

The Associated Press contributed to this story.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.