ShareThis Page
Man accepts plea deal in tot’s death |

Man accepts plea deal in tot’s death

| Tuesday, April 6, 2004 12:00 a.m

An East Hills man pleaded guilty in Allegheny County court Monday to involuntary manslaughter in the death of his girlfriend’s 2-year-old daughter in 2002.

As part of a plea deal, Donald Williams, 22, agreed to testify against Tia Banks, 21, of Penn Hills, at her homicide trial in the death of her daughter, Atia.

Assistant District Attorney Laura Ditka dropped charges of aggravated assault, reckless endangering and endangering the welfare of a child against Williams in return for his plea before Common Pleas Judge Kathleen A. Durkin.

Williams and Banks were originally charged with homicide. Ditka declined comment on why she offered the plea agreement to Williams while prosecuting Banks for homicide.

Atia was taken to Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh in Oakland on Dec. 16, 2002, after becoming lethargic and listless, her second hospitalization for the symptoms that month. She died six days later.

The Coroner’s Office ruled the girl died of blunt force trauma to the head. Examiners found recent and older head injuries they said were too severe to have been caused by normal childhood accidents.

Banks’ trial before Durkin is scheduled for May 24.

Williams, who made no comment during his guilty plea, faces up to 10 years in prison at his June 9 sentencing.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.