ShareThis Page
Man arrested in gay rally on probation for G-20 |

Man arrested in gay rally on probation for G-20

Bobby Kerlik
| Friday, August 26, 2011 12:00 p.m

A man arrested this week during a rally against violence toward gay people was on probation for causing $15,000 in damage during the G-20 protests nearly two years ago.

Pittsburgh police charged David Japenga, 22, of Garfield with obstructing public passages, resisting arrest, failure to disperse and escape.

Police said they arrested Japenga and four others on Wednesday when they refused repeated commands not to block streets and sidewalks. Japenga was handcuffed at the end of a foot chase with police.

Japenga served about 4 1/2 months in jail for his conviction on four misdemeanors and a felony for breaking windows at Citizens Bank, Irish Design Center and Quizno’s on Sept. 24, 2009, while world leaders were meeting in Pittsburgh for an economic conference.

Common Pleas Judge Edward J. Borkowski, who sentenced Japenga in the earlier case, signed a bench warrant on Thursday for Japenga violating his probation.

Japenga’s attorney, Patrick Nightingale, said he wondered if police singled out the anarchists to arrest.

“There were 50 to 100 people that participated in the rally, and it seems there were only a few arrests,” Nightingale said. “I’m confident he did not participate in the rally to engage in criminal conduct, but rather to exercise his First Amendment rights as he believed them to be.”

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.