ShareThis Page
Man charged with 2 Avonmore bank robberies |

Man charged with 2 Avonmore bank robberies

Valley News Dispatch
| Thursday, August 2, 2007 12:00 a.m

PITTSBURGH — A North Versailles man has been indicted on federal charges of robbing three banks, including an Avonmore bank twice.

The U.S. Attorney’s office said William F. Perry, 63, used a “replica firearm” in a total of five robberies at three banks from January 2004 to last September.

He is charged with 10 counts of bank robbery and armed bank robbery.

Included were two robberies at the First National Bank at 437 Westmoreland Ave. in Avonmore. Those robberies occurred on April 18 and Sept. 18 last year.

In the first incident, the robber wore a dark ski mask and ordered everyone in the bank to floor before forcing a clerk to allow him into the vault.

During the second Avonmore robbery, Perry allegedly wore a black wig, sunglasses and a distinctive ball cap police hoped would help them identify the suspect.

Perry also is accused of robbing an ESB Bank in Ellwood City in January 2004 and a Washington Federal Savings Bank in Hickory, Washington County, twice in fall 2004.

Authorities have not disclosed how much money was reported stolen.

If convicted on all charges, Perry could face up to 225 years in prison and a fine of $2.5 million.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.