ShareThis Page
Man charged with threatening Roddy, other official |

Man charged with threatening Roddy, other official

| Wednesday, July 23, 2003 12:00 p.m

A Sheraden man has been charged with making threats against Allegheny County Chief Executive Jim Roddey and County Manager Bob Webb.

Arthur Lee Collins, 48, was jailed Tuesday on charges of making terroristic threats and harassment and stalking by communication, police said.

According to an affidavit of probable cause filed to support the charges, Collins called the courthouse July 15 and threatened to kill Roddey and Webb. He repeated the threat against Roddey on Monday, the affidavit states.

County police Superintendent Ken Fulton said threats against any county official are taken seriously. Detectives arrested Collins at a Green Tree hotel Monday night, Fulton said.

“It is very unfortunate that people in public life occasionally experience this type of unpleasantness,” Roddey said in a written statement.

Collins, who is unemployed, was lodged in the county jail on $10,000 bond. He faces a hearing Monday.

Collins has a history of arrests and convictions for domestic disputes and drunken driving, court records show. In 1999, he was charged with holding a woman at knifepoint.

During a hearing, he tried to “fire” Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Manning from presiding over the case and shouted that the judge was impeached.

While in jail awaiting trial, Collins was overheard threatening then-Gov. Tom Ridge, according to state police.

In that case, Manning ruled that Collins was incompetent to stand trial and sent him to Mayview State Hospital.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.