ShareThis Page
Man charged with trying to steal cameras pleads guilty |

Man charged with trying to steal cameras pleads guilty

| Saturday, October 3, 2009 12:00 a.m

A 52-year-old Ohio man arrested in May on charges that he used pepper spray while attempting to steal cameras at the Wal-Mart in the Hilltop Plaza in East Franklin pleaded guilty in Armstrong County court Friday.

Paul Edward Smartt Jr., of 7108 Longview Drive, Solon, Ohio, pleaded guilty to charges of robbery, retail theft, simple assault and harassment in the case against him.

According to assistant district attorney George Kepple, Smartt placed the cameras inside another box and when he was stopped leaving the store, he resisted and used pepper spray on an employee.

Smartt removed a $10 box fan from its packaging at the Wal-Mart and put two Canon digital cameras, valued at $1,428, inside in place of the fan, court documents said. He paid for the fan and was leaving the store when the security alarm triggered.

As Smartt was being escorted through the store he produced a can of pepper spray from his pocket and sprayed it in the face of an employee, according to the criminal affidavit.

The plea included a recommendation by the District Attorney’s office that Smartt serve 18 to 36 months on the charge of robbery. The remaining charges will be withdrawn.

Judge James Panchik said Smartt could face a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of $25,000.

Smartt is scheduled for sentencing Nov. 24.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.