Archive

Man cited twice in a week for truck piled too high | TribLIVE.com
News

Man cited twice in a week for truck piled too high

Chicopee1
Massachusetts State Police
Massachusetts State Police made the first stop on I-91 in Springfield when spotted a man driving a red pickup stacked high with furniture on June 20.
Chicopee2
Chicopee Police Department
A Chicopee police officer pulled over the same driver for hauling branches stacked nearly as high as the furniture and also blocking the tail lights and plate.

Police in Massachusetts issued two citations in one week for overloaded pickup trucks. The surpising thing was the drivers were the same person. In the same truck.

Massachusetts State Police made the first stop on I-91 in Springfield when spotted a man driving a red pickup stacked high with furniture on June 20. They explained that his load was precariously stacked and also his tail light and license plate were obstructed. The officer wrote the driver a ticket.

Five days later, a Chicopee police officer pulled over the same driver for hauling branches stacked nearly as high as the furniture and also blocking the tail lights and plate. Second citation written.

Chicopee Police Department posted photos on Facebook with the title “FROM THE FILES OF SOME JUST DO NOT GET IT.”

The department concluded the post with this note for drivers: “If you have to carry a load in your pickup truck, DO NOT DO IT LIKE THIS. And, if you ever see something like this operating, call, so we can stop it, before someone gets hurt.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.