ShareThis Page
Man convicted in cousin’s murder in Saltlick seeks retrial |

Man convicted in cousin’s murder in Saltlick seeks retrial

Mary Pickels
| Saturday, March 20, 2010 12:00 a.m

A Fayette County man convicted of second-degree murder in 2004 for the murder of his 13-year-old cousin appeared before Judge Steve Leskinen Friday to request a new trial.

Brian Keith Hays, 27, is serving a life sentence for the death of Danielle McManus, whose charred remains were found on May 3, 2003, in a smoldering van parked in a junkyard near her Saltlick Township home.

In a written confession, Hays admitted to police that he had sex with his cousin before smoking crack cocaine with her in the van. She lost consciousness, the statement says, and he set the van on fire in a panic.

During trial, Hays testified that the confession was coerced.

He told jurors that the two smoked marijuana and had sex, but that McManus was gone after he came in from smoking a cigarette on the porch. Hays and McManus lived together with family members.

Hays is incarcerated at the State Correctional Institute at Rockview, in Centre County.

Yesterday, Hays told Leskinen that he had ineffective counsel and that he should have been permitted a change of venue for trial.

A petition filed by his court-appointed attorney, Dianne Zerega, states that James King III, an inmate at SCI-Rockview, should have been called as a witness at his trial.

It states that King would have testified that on the night McManus died, King saw her in a vehicle with a man he did not know. King allegedly said he talked with them and said they were attempting to obtain cocaine. He said he knew McManus and told her to go home.

Assistant Public Defender Mary Campbell Spegar, who defended Hays at trial, testified that she attempted to subpoena King in 2004, but that Hays did not tell her King might have information about McManus’ whereabouts before her death.

A subpoena sent to the Fayette County Prison, where King was believed to be lodged at the time, contained an illegible signature, Spegar said.

King did not make himself available at trial, she said.

Hays also claimed he requested a change of venue before trial.

“I didn’t believe I could get a fair trial in this county, with all the publicity,” he said.

But “he never voiced a concern,” Spegar said.

“I believe the testimony of King was essential. It would have been exculpatory, and he should have been called,” Zerega said.

Leskinen agreed to provisionally admit videotaped testimony from King during an 11 a.m. hearing Thursday.

Mary Pickels is a Tribune-Review staff reporter. You can contact Mary at 724-836-5401, or via Twitter .

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.