ShareThis Page
Man faces life at resentencing |

Man faces life at resentencing

A former Baldwin Borough man who once faced death by lethal injection for killing a gun shop manager will plead guilty next week to first-degree murder and receive a life term at his resentencing, his attorney said Thursday.

John Elash said Ralph Bolden, 35, will enter the plea in the slaying of John Calabro, 50, during a robbery at the former Valor Hi-Adventure Sports Shop in Baldwin Borough on July 30, 1994.

Bolden’s first-degree murder conviction was upheld last June, but the state Supreme Court overturned the death penalty because the prosecution asked the jury to consider an improper reason to reach its decision.

By a 6-1 vote, the appellate court ordered a new sentencing hearing to be conducted by Common Pleas Judge David S. Cercone.

Elash, who represented Bolden on appeal but not at trial, said the district attorney’s office has agreed to Bolden’s guilty plea and a mandatory life term without chance of parole, dropping its pursuit of the death penalty.

The district attorney’s office declined to comment on the case. The resentencing hearing is scheduled before Cercone at 1:30 p.m. March 9.

Calabro was shot in the forehead at close range during the holdup in which rifles and handguns were stolen.

Another store employee, Michael Elder, who reported to work shortly after Calabro was killed, was shot in the face but survived.

State Supreme Court Chief Justice John P. Flaherty, who wrote the majority opinion that overturned Bolden’s death sentence, said Cercone had erred in permitting the jury to consider that the defendant had created ‘a grave risk of death to another person in addition to the victim of the murder.’

Bolden presented testimony that he suffered from a psychiatric disorder. He said that prevented him from forming the specific intent to kill.

Robert Baird can be reached at (412) 391-8650.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

Images and text copyright © 2019 Trib Total Media, LLC | Reproduction or reuse prohibited without written consent. | Terms of Service
Click me