ShareThis Page
Man gets 6 to 12 years in girlfriend’s shooting |

Man gets 6 to 12 years in girlfriend’s shooting

| Friday, September 24, 2004 12:00 a.m

An elderly Wilkins man who shot his girlfriend and stuffed her into a freezer will most likely die in prison, an Allegheny County judge told the convicted man Thursday.

Common Pleas Judge David R. Cashman sentenced Martin Matgouranis, 69, to six to 12 years for the November 2000 attack on Cheryl Bracken, a barmaid who worked at his Swissvale tavern, Marty’s Place.

Bracken, 41, who still has the bullet lodged in her skull, said after the hearing she was pleased she won’t have to see Matgouranis again.

“I’m happy it’s over with,” she said.

A jury convicted Matgouranis in July on charges of attempted homicide and aggravated assault. He beat Bracken and shot her in the neck during an argument, and then, assuming she was dead, locked her body in a freezer at the bar. An employee found her and rescued her.

Cashman called the case “one of the most bizarre crimes I’ve encountered.”

Matgouranis’ grown children and two of his friends asked Cashman to be lenient because Matgouranis suffers from heart problems. Matgouranis faced a maximum penalty of 22 1/2 to 45 years in prison, Cashman said.

Defense attorney Patrick J. Thomassey, who told the judge he had known Matgouranis for 25 years, called the sentence fair. Matgouranis covered his face and did not comment as sheriff’s deputies led him away in handcuffs.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.