Archive

Man hurt in Greene County mine accident | TribLIVE.com
News

Man hurt in Greene County mine accident

A coal miner was crushed below the waist on Monday at a Consol Energy Inc. mine in Greene County.

The unidentified 35-year-old man was in stable condition by afternoon with injuries that are not life-threatening, officials said.

He suffered a fractured pelvis and internal bleeding, but earlier reports that he had other injuries were incorrect, said Susan Bealko, safety director at GMS Mine Repair & Maintenance, the contractor that employed the man.

The accident happened at 3:30 a.m. in the Bailey Mine Complex near a portal in Richhill, according to the state Department of Environmental Protection. An empty platform for rock dust slipped off its supply car, crushing the miner, department spokesman John Poister said.

Medics flew him to Ruby Memorial Hospital in Morgantown. The miner arrived at 6:04 a.m. and went into surgery to stop the bleeding, Poister said. The first report from the scene indicated he had other internal injuries, but that was before the hospital evaluation, Poister said.

The agency and the Mine Safety and Health Administration are working with both companies to investigate, officials said.

Cecil-based Consol did not have to stop operations because the accident happened in an idle part of the mine, spokeswoman Lynn Seay said.

The victim was on a five-man crew of three GMS workers and two Consol employees, Poister said.

Timothy Puko is a Trib Total Media staff writer. He can be reached at 412-320-7991 or [email protected].


TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.