ShareThis Page
Man not likely to get jail time |

Man not likely to get jail time

| Friday, January 14, 2005 12:00 a.m

A Hampton man convicted Thursday of simple assault for hurling a high school basketball referee to the floor is not likely to face jail time.

Allegheny County Judge John A. Zottola acquitted Peter Dukovich, 48, of three other charges — disorderly conduct, reckless endangerment and assault on a sports official — in the February attack on referee Ronald Bell, of Scottdale, Westmoreland County, during a Hampton-Deer Lakes basketball game.

Bell suffered head, neck and shoulder injuries and testified during the two-day, non-jury trial that he has been unable to work or drive since the attack. Dukovich and his wife, RaeLynn, stormed the floor after a fight involving their son, Tim, broke out under the hoop.

Zottola called the assault uncharacteristic of Dukovich and said the crime did not warrant jail time. The judge likely will place Dukovich on probation at his Feb. 18 sentencing. Simple assault carries a maximum sentence of two years in jail.

Pennsylvania is one of 19 states with laws that punish people who assault sports officials. The law, passed in 1990, is considered among the nation’s toughest, carrying a maximum fine of $10,000 and sentence of up to five years. Pennsylvania was among the first states in the country to pass such a law.

Regional and state sports league representatives were stunned that Zottola found the law didn’t apply in Dukovich’s case.

“It sends the wrong message,” said Larry Hanley, executive director of the Western Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic League. “It doesn’t help the law if the court system is unwilling to or shows some unwillingness to carry it through.”

Robert A. Lombardi, who administers the Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Association officials program, expected the ruling to reverberate here and beyond.

“The No. 1 reason across the nation that people do not become sports officials is (verbal and physical) abuse,” he said. “An adverse decision like this doesn’t help any of us in the officiating community.”

Bell said he had hoped the verdict would send a message to parents of high school athletes.

“I hope this will never happen to another person,” he said.

Dukovich declined to comment.

“Mr. Dukovich is an example of how somebody should act at games,” said his lawyer, Anthony Mariani. “Mr. Dukovich was totally justified. This was a man defending his family from an attack.”

The 6-foot, 300-pound Dukovich testified that he saw Bell poking and pushing RaeLynn Dukovich and that he threw the referee aside trying to protect her. Zottola hinted Wednesday that he might acquit Dukovich of assaulting a sports official, saying the law targeted fans who attack referees over unpopular calls. Dukovich said he wasn’t disputing a call.

School officials testified that Bell never touched RaeLynn Dukovich, who ran onto the floor after her son, then a junior forward for Hampton, began scuffling with a Deer Lakes player. RaeLynn Dukovich pleaded guilty last year to disorderly conduct and was fined $300.

Two or three reports of assaults on officials are filed each week with the 17,000-member National Association of Sports Officials, said the group’s founder and president, Barry Mano.

“There’s more bad behavior being directed at officials today that at any time since we started this organization in 1976,” Mano said. “The trend is in the wrong direction.”

Zottola acknowledged as much.

“It is unfortunately alarming because it is becoming characteristic of sporting events that they will include some sort of violence,” the judge said.

Zottola ordered Dukovich to work out a plan for restitution with Bell before the sentencing hearing. Deer Lakes Superintendent Mark King testified that the district has been notified by Bell’s attorney that the referee is considering filing a lawsuit over the attack.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.