ShareThis Page
Man shot in Monessen |

Man shot in Monessen

| Tuesday, July 3, 2007 12:00 a.m

MONESSEN – Arrest warrants are out for three suspects allegedly involved in a shooting that occurred in broad daylight Monday afternoon near downtown Monessen.

Anthony Law, 22, of 209 Prospect Ave., Charleroi; Dennis Darnell Hawkins, 22, of 147 Victoria Drive, Brentwood; and a third, unidentified white male police described as in his early 20s are wanted in connection to the 12:53 p.m. incident at the intersection of Ontario Street and Schoonmaker Avenue beside the Eastgate Exxon.

According to affidavits of probable cause filed by Monessen police Lt. Gary Tretter with Magisterial District Judge Joseph Dalfonso in Monessen, police said one or all of the suspects forced Reginald Davis into a vehicle, beat him and later shot him.

Davis’ age and address were not available at presstime.

Davis was found lying wounded on the street beside the gas station and convenience store. He was shot on his right side.

Police and a Mon Valley Emergency Medical Service crew were on the scene minutes after the shooting.

Davis was taken by medical helicopter to Allegheny General Hospital in Pittsburgh, where he was listed in critical condition late this morning.

At the scene, witness Rosalie Hudock, of Donora, said she and her daughter, Julia Hall, heard a gunshot as they were riding by in their car on Donner Avenue, across the street from the gas station.

Hudock said she saw Davis fall out of the car from the passenger side.

Hall used her cellular telephone to call 911, Hudock said.

“I was like, ‘Oh my God! Somebody’s shot!’ And then I looked and he was lying on the ground,” Hudock said. “I’m shaking.”

Law, Hawkins and the unidentified suspect each are being charged with criminal attempt, aggravated assault, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person, criminal conspiracy and kidnapping.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.