ShareThis Page
Man sought in North Side parking lot robberies |

Man sought in North Side parking lot robberies

| Thursday, November 19, 2009 12:00 p.m

Pittsburgh police are looking for a man they say robbed a North Side parking attendant for the second time this month.

The latest holdup occurred at 11 a.m. Wednesday when a man approached the attendant inside the booth in the Alco parking lot on Sandusky Street, showed a gun and demanded money. The attendant told police he gave the suspect an undisclosed amount of money from the cash register, robbery squad Sgt. Lavonnie Bickerstaff said.

The suspect is black, about 6 feet 1 inch tall, weighs about 160 pounds and wore a hoodie sweatshirt with a blue and white skull pattern and black pants. He had a black mask pulled over his chin and mouth and a black glove on his right hand with a white stripe between the index finger and thumb.

A man with the same description robbed a parking lot attendant about 9:30 a.m. Nov. 5 in the Alco Parking Gold Lot 1 on West General Robinson Street. He showed a silver handgun, Bickerstaff said.

Surveillance cameras caught the suspect running from the scene of the first robbery and getting into the driver’s seat of an early 1990s green Nissan, possibly a Maxima, which was parked on Martindale Street, police said.

No vehicle was seen in the second robbery, Bickerstaff said. No one was injured during either robbery.

Anyone with information is asked to call the Pittsburgh police robbery squad at 412-323-7151.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.