Man, unborn child die as result of head-on crash in Indiana County |

Man, unborn child die as result of head-on crash in Indiana County

Paul Peirce

A 31-year-old Armstrong County man was killed and an unborn child died later at UPMC Mercy in Pittsburgh in a head-on collision Tuesday night along Route 422 in Indiana County.

Brandon Scott Miller of 725 Woodward Ave., Kittanning, was pronounced dead at the scene of the accident at 10:47 p.m. near the intersection of Route 422 and Cunningham Road in Armstrong Township, according to Coroner Michael Baker.

Baker said authorities are trying to determine why Miller’s westbound car crossed the center line and struck a vehicle head-on.

The 25-year-old pregnant woman who was driving the vehicle, who was not identified by authorities, was taken by medical helicopter to the Pittsburgh hospital, where she lost her unborn child, according to the Allegheny County Medical Examiner’s office. Her 3-year-old daughter, who was strapped in a car seat, suffered minor injuries, police said.

The woman was not wearing a seat belt and was ejected from her vehicle. Miller also was not wearing a seat belt, according to police.

Baker said he has not ruled out the possibility that a sudden medical problem may have caused Miller to veer into the opposite lane. He said toxicology tests are pending.

Funeral arrangements are incomplete for Miller, Baker said.

Paul Peirce is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 724-850-2860 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.