ShareThis Page
Man waives robbery hearing, apologizes |

Man waives robbery hearing, apologizes

| Friday, October 4, 2002 12:00 a.m

A Shaler man whose alleged robbery of a New Kensington store was thwarted by a cane-wielding, 85-year-old woman waived his right to a preliminary hearing Thursday, but not before apologizing for the incident.

Justin R. Petroff, 29, is charged with robbery, simple assault and reckless endangerment.

Petroff made a public confession as he was surrounded by cameras and reporters when Westmoreland County Sheriff’s deputies brought him into the courtroom.

“I’m sorry for what I did, and I’m sorry for the people I hurt,” Petroff said.

Petroff said he didn’t remember much about the incident because he had been under the influence of drugs during the attempted robbery.

Police said Petroff tried to rob the Family Dollar store in Central City Plaza Sept. 16 when a customer, Ruby White, bashed him with her cane, scaring him off.

White appeared at the district court office in New Kensington for the hearing. She was surrounded by media who asked whether she considered herself feisty — the way a relative had characterized her in a news account a week after the incident.

“I’m not feisty,” White said as she pushed her way through the crowd with her walker. “I just don’t put up with any nonsense.”

Police said Petroff held a manual can opener to the arm of a cashier at the store and demanded money. The female cashier slammed her register drawer shut just before White stepped in and surprised the robber with her metal cane.

Before leaving the courtroom, Senior District Justice Frank Delbane presented White with a plastic “junior deputy” badge. Delbane was sitting in for New Kensington District Justice Frank J. Pallone Jr.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.