ShareThis Page
Man who caused fire will stand trial |

Man who caused fire will stand trial

Ellen James
| Saturday, September 6, 2003 12:00 a.m

A Mt. Washington man accused of driving with a suspended license when he crashed into a BP Gas station will stand trial on charges of making false reports to police and driving with a suspended license.

Paul Malloy, 54, of Mt. Washington appeared before Mt. Lebanon District Justice Geoffrey Wright on Thursday.

Malloy, who had been convicted of driving while under the influence, was driving alone when he steered his smoking truck into the parking lot of the BP Express at Washington Road and Gilkeson Road in Mt. Lebanon, bounced the vehicle off a guard rail and ignited a blaze that quickly spread to the building, police said.

He then called his wife, Joyce, to the scene, and she told police several times that she had been driving the truck. Police confronted her with statements from witnesses who said they’d seen Paul Malloy behind the wheel. The couple admitted that Paul Malloy had been driving, police said.

Joyce Malloy was charged with giving a false report to police and allowing a person with a suspended license to drive. She pleaded guilty to the latter charge, while the charge of filing a false report was withdrawn. She was fined $400.

Paul Malloy’s next court date is Nov. 10 in Allegheny County Court.

The BP gas station is still undergoing renovations, but the pumps are open. The convenience store is expected to reopen by mid-October, according to a BP corporate spokesman.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.