ShareThis Page
Man will plead guilty of child beating |

Man will plead guilty of child beating

| Tuesday, November 27, 2001 12:00 a.m

A Connellsville man indicated during criminal court pretrial proceedings Monday that he will plead guilty to charges of beating his former girlfriend’s 5-year-old child.

Raymond Tucker Bellamy, of 1827 Rock St., has been offered a five-to-10-year sentence by the Fayette County District Attorney’s Office in exchange for entering the plea to an aggravated assault charge. Bellamy, 29, indicated his acceptance through Public Defender Jeffrey Whiteko.

Bellamy was charged after a July 25 incident in which police contend that Bellamy beat Caitlyn Nicklow into unconsciousness and left her temporarily paralyzed. Bellamy has been dating the child’s mother, Marcia Riggin, since March and had quit his job to watch Caitlyn during the day while Riggin worked. Police said Riggin came home from work on July 25 and found her daughter unconscious and unresponsive.

The child was taken to Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC Health System where doctors diagnosed her injuries, including bleeding on the brain and multiple bruises.

The attack left Caitlyn, who is autistic, paralyzed on her left side. During Bellamy’s preliminary hearing proceedings in late August, Riggin told a reporter that her daughter has started a long recovery.

Judge Conrad Capuzzi will accept Bellamy’s formal plea this morning during court proceedings.

is a former freelancer.

Categories: News
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.