ShareThis Page
Manheim Central coach accuses Penn Hills of ‘cheap shot’ after player injured on final play |

Manheim Central coach accuses Penn Hills of ‘cheap shot’ after player injured on final play

Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
The Penn Hills football team takes the field at the start of the PIAA Class 5A state championship game against Manheim Central Friday, Dec. 7, 2018, at Hersheypark Stadium.

An injured Manheim Central player left Hersheypark Stadium’s turf on a cart Friday night, and afterward his coach accused Penn Hills players of taking cheap shots.

Barons junior Clay Bedi was injured with 3 seconds left as Manheim Central attempted an on-side kick. Penn Hills recovered the kick and won the PIAA Class 5A championship 36-31.

However, the game was halted for an extended period as medical personnel attended to Bedi. The final 3 seconds were eventually erased from the clock.

“He took a headshot from one of those (Penn Hills) guys,” Manheim Central coach Dave Hahn said. “There were a couple of headshots from those guys. That (ticked) me off. That was (expletive). He’s hurting. Hopefully he’ll be OK. He’ll be OK.”

Asked if he thought the hit was a cheap shot, Hahn said yes.

“Not thought, I know it was a cheap shot,” Hahn said, “and I’m not happy about it. … We had a kid that ran straight across the field and just plugged him in the head.”

Hahn also accused Penn Hills of targeting his quarterback’s head.

“If one of my kids did that, his (butt) would be off the field,” Hahn said.

Penn Hills coach Jon LeDonne said he didn’t see the hit on the kickoff, but believed there was no intent to injure Bedi.

“We tell our guys if the ball’s over your head, go block somebody,” LeDonne said. “I’m told that’s what we did. It’s unfortunate the kid got hurt but it’s not like anything was intentional.”

Chris Harlan is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Chris at [email protected] or via Twitter @CHarlan_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.