Mark Madden: Defenseman reclamation projects are Penguins’ specialty |

Mark Madden: Defenseman reclamation projects are Penguins’ specialty

Columbus Blue Jackets defenseman Jack Johnson in the third period of an NHL hockey game against the Anaheim Ducks in Anaheim, Calif., Friday, March 2, 2018. (AP Photo/Kyusung Gong)

Jack Johnson hadn’t even signed his contract, and Penguins fans on Twitter were wondering when it could be bought out.

Welcome to Pittsburgh.

Johnson’s reported five-year deal might be a year too long, but the Penguins’ window will be shut by then anyway.

The price is right at $3.25 million per season. That’s the going rate for a defenseman of Johnson’s ability, pedigree and age (31).

The Penguins won’t ask Johnson to be Kris Letang, or even Letang’s partner. They need Johnson to be Ron Hainsey or Ben Lovejoy or Trevor Daley: A defenseman coming off a pedestrian recent past who gets resuscitated by the surroundings and opportunity.

The Penguins also need Johnson to not be Matt Hunwick. Please, God, no.

Assistant coach Sergei Gonchar should help Johnson. He’s certainly aided retreads like Justin Schultz and Jamie Oleksiak with helpful one-on-one instruction.

Is Johnson next in that lineage?

The Penguins have specialized in blue-line reclamation projects. Gonchar is what Pirates’ pitching coach Ray Searage is supposed to be.

Johnson is Sidney Crosby’s buddy from prep school, but that’s not why the Penguins signed him.

Johnson’s fancy stats stink, but that wasn’t enough reason for the Penguins to take a pass.

Analytics can’t be transferred exactly from one team to another or one system to another.

It’s the GM’s job to figure how a player fits, and Jim Rutherford has a good track record in that regard.

Johnson was rotten this past season: just 11 points, minus-6 and a healthy scratch in Columbus’ first-round playoff loss to Washington.

He was great in 2016-17: 32 points and plus-23. He’s been a top-four defenseman most of his career. Which Jack Johnson will show up in Pittsburgh?

Hopefully, it’s a version that can be a solid bottom-pair defenseman, because that’s all the Penguins need him to be.

To be sure, Johnson offers options beyond that.

If the Penguins are serious about cutting Letang’s minutes, it might behoove them to pair Johnson with Schultz, Olli Maatta with Oleksiak and Letang with Brian Dumoulin.

Letang and Dumoulin would be the No. 1 duo, but the other tandems would be balanced enough that coach Mike Sullivan could roll six defensemen and have solid quality and pairing throughout. It’s safe to bet Johnson has been promised a shot at that.

If Sullivan would prefer to lean on his top four, he can put Maatta with Schultz and use Johnson and Oleksiak as a very competitive bottom pair.

Johnson’s physicality and tangible desire were big selling points for the Penguins. Both might come in handy when the Penguins and Washington meet in the playoffs for a fourth consecutive spring.

Those needs might also be reflected in the Penguins’ hunt for a depth forward.

Johnson blocks shots and manages the puck OK. His gap and defensive positioning might need a little polish. But playing for a legit contender instead of a one-and-done specialist might go a long way in that regard, as will playing for a coach who isn’t a maniac lurching toward his expiration date.

Bottom-pair defensemen and fourth-line forwards are mostly incidental. Johnson won’t be a standout nor will he hurt.

Oleksiak and Chad Ruhwedel were hardly scintillating as the bottom pair in this past season’s playoffs. But they weren’t the reason the Penguins were eliminated by the Capitals.

This is a somewhat complicated version of a column on Johnson’s signing.

Many just typed one paragraph: “The Penguins are making a mistake,” followed by a listing of available free agents the Penguins weren’t interested in or going to get. Below that, graph upon graph of somebody else’s fancy stats, color-coded for your convenience.

That’s an easier column to prepare.

But those writers don’t get paid much, if at all.

Mark Madden hosts a radio show 3-6 p.m. weekdays on WXDX-FM (105.9).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.