Mark Madden: Pitt fans foolish to resent Penn State for ending series |

Mark Madden: Pitt fans foolish to resent Penn State for ending series

Penn State quarterback Trace McSorley takes off against Pitt during the first half Saturday, Sept. 9, 2017, in University Park.

Pitt football fans have their knickers in a twist because Penn State signed to play Temple in 2026 and ’27 even as the end of the Nittany Lions’ current series with Pitt is in sight. (Pitt hosts Penn State on Saturday. The last game in that four-year contract is next season at University Park.)

Penn State also inked two-game pacts with Delaware and Villanova.

Any annoyance is unfounded. But Pitt fans should be forgiven. They simply can’t see their program as others do.

Pitt is a college team in a pro town. Empty seats at home games are rampant, except when visiting fans (like Penn State’s) make up the difference. Visiting fans (like Penn State’s) will buy season tickets just to get that game. That’s why Pitt wants to play Penn State: Finance, not rivalry.

Pitt football just isn’t a big deal unless it wins nine or 10 games, and sometimes not even then.

The generation that sees Pitt-Penn State as “the” game is dying out. Younger Pitt fans miss the West Virginia game more.

The notion that it’s a civic duty for Pitt and Penn State to play is idiotic. Some feel the state legislature should get involved. That’s even more idiotic.

For Penn State, playing Temple is a sure win. Pitt is only slightly less so, but the surer the better when it comes to the demands of reaching the college football playoff semifinals. Remember, Penn State won the Big Ten in 2016 and still didn’t make the playoff.

Pitt fans want to play Penn State. Nittany Lions fans are indifferent to playing Pitt. Elitism is involved, but it’s well-earned.

Penn State has plenty of huge games in the Big Ten and a fan base that will show up without the trigger of a marquee matchup. It’s not Penn State’s fault Pitt is in the mostly bland ACC and has few hardcore fans.

Pitt coach Pat Narduzzi reacted like this when told Penn State agreed to play Temple: “Ha. Figures.”

That reaction would be more palatable if Narduzzi wasn’t a mere 21-17 in three seasons at Pitt, getting Pitt nowhere near legitimate prominence, and if Penn State hadn’t beaten Pitt, 31-14, last year en route to a 5-7 mark for Pitt.

Mark Madden hosts a radio show 3-6 p.m. weekdays on WXDX-FM (105.9).

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.